HIV-2 viral tropism influences CD4+ T cell count regardless of viral load
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: HIV-2 infection is characterized by low plasma viraemia and slower progression to AIDS in comparison with HIV-1 infection. However, antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-2 is less effective and often fails to provide optimal CD4 recovery. METHODS: We examined viral tropism in persons with HIV-2 infection enrolled in the HIV-2 Spanish cohort. Viral tropism was estimated based on V3 sequences obtained from plasma RNA and/or proviral DNA. RESULTS: From a total of 279 individuals with HIV-2 infection recorded in the Spanish national register, 58 V3 sequences belonging to 42 individuals were evaluated. X4 viruses were recognized in 14 patients (33%). Patients with X4 viruses had lower median CD4+ cell counts than patients with R5 viruses [130 (17-210) versus 359 (180-470) cells/mm(3); P = 0.007]. This was true even considering only the subset of 19 patients on antiretroviral therapy [94 (16-147) versus 184 (43-368) cells/mm(3); P = 0.041]. In multivariate analysis, significant differences in CD4+ cell counts between patients with X4 and R5 viruses remained after adjusting for age, gender, antiretroviral therapy and viral load. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of X4-tropic viruses in HIV-2 infection is associated with low CD4+ cell counts, regardless of antiretroviral treatment. Along with CD4+ cell counts, viral tropism testing may assist decisions about when to initiate antiretroviral therapy in HIV-2-infected individuals.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- HIV-2 viral tropism influences CD4+ T cell count regardless of viral load
- Date Crossref
- 30/04/2014
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.