Impact of bundle for central line associated bloodstream infections prevention
Rattachement africain : ar. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Since Mar’10 the following measures were implemented at the ICUs to prevent CL-BSI: use central venous catheters only if strictly necessary; avoiding the femoral site if possible; hand hygiene with alcohol-gel before insertion; using full-barrier precautions during the insertion of central venous catheters; cleaning the skin with chlorhexidine (2%) and removing unnecessary catheters. The implementation was carried out through the model of "5Es" (Engage, Education, Execution, Evaluation and Encouragement). The rate of CL-BSI during the intervention period (Mar’10-Feb’11) was compared with the average of the 12 months prior to implementation. All costs are expressed in US dollars. For economic impact analysis an attributable cost of U$S 5,500 was used. The incidence rate of CL-BSI at the baseline period was 6.84 events per ‰ device-days in comparison with 2.70 events per ‰ device-days during implementation period (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.69, p<0,01). There are no changes in the utilization ratio between both periods (0.45 [6429/14222] and 0.44 [7025/16077], respectively). During the implementation period the level of adherence rises to more than 90% in all bundle components. While the annual incremental cost to prevent CL-BSI was U$S 28,300, the overall net savings was U$S 130,500. The effective implementation of this bundle in our hospital reduced the CL-BSI with a significant net saving.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of bundle for central line associated bloodstream infections prevention
- Date Crossref
- 29/06/2011
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.