The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence or absence of tumor at the surgical margin in cases of impalpable breast carcinoma could be predicted accurately with specimen radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained single-view radiographs of 119 consecutive surgical biopsy specimens of impalpable invasive or in situ ductal carcinoma. Radiographic lesions were classified as a mass with moderately well defined margins, a mass with poorly defined margins, or microcalcifications without an associated mass. The radiographic appearance of the impalpable cancer, the margin as judged from the specimen radiograph, the tumor's histologic appearance, and the histologic appearance of the tumor margin were then correlated. RESULTS: Specimen radiographs showed tumor at the surgical margin in 63 cases; 62 of these were confirmed histologically (positive predictive value, 98%). Specimen radiographs showed tumor-free surgical margins in 56 cases; 18 of these were confirmed histologically (negative predictive value, 32%). These results were independent of the radiographic appearance of the lesion or the tumor's histologic appearance. CONCLUSION: Decisions based on findings on specimen radiographs were valid only if the radiographs showed tumor at the margin of the specimen.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma.
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/1994
- Éditeur
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.