Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2012 article

A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies

74Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: While increasing attention is placed on using evidence-based decision making (EBDM) to improve public health, there is little research assessing the current EBDM capacity of the public health workforce. Public health agencies serve a wide range of populations with varying levels of resources. Our survey tool allows an individual agency to collect data that reflects its unique workforce. METHODS: Health department leaders and academic researchers collaboratively developed and conducted cross-sectional surveys in Kansas and Mississippi (USA) to assess EBDM capacity. Surveys were delivered to state- and local-level practitioners and community partners working in chronic disease control and prevention. The core component of the surveys was adopted from a previously tested instrument and measured gaps (importance versus availability) in competencies for EBDM in chronic disease. Other survey questions addressed expectations and incentives for using EBDM, self-efficacy in three EBDM skills, and estimates of EBDM within the agency. RESULTS: In both states, participants identified communication with policymakers, use of economic evaluation, and translation of research to practice as top competency gaps. Self-efficacy in developing evidence-based chronic disease control programs was lower than in finding or using data. Public health practitioners estimated that approximately two-thirds of programs in their agency were evidence-based. Mississippi participants indicated that health department leaders' expectations for the use of EBDM was approximately twice that of co-workers' expectations and that the use of EBDM could be increased with training and leadership prioritization. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of EBDM capacity in Kansas and Mississippi built upon previous nationwide findings to identify top gaps in core competencies for EBDM in chronic disease and to estimate a percentage of programs in U.S. health departments that are evidence-based. The survey can serve as a valuable tool for other health departments and non-governmental organizations to assess EBDM capacity within their own workforce and to assist in the identification of approaches that will enhance the uptake of EBDM processes in public health programming and policymaking. Localized survey findings can provide direction for focusing workforce training programs and can indicate the types of incentives and policies that could affect the culture of EBDM in the workplace.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies
Date Crossref
09/03/2012
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Washington University in St. Louis Prevention Research Center in St pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Kansas Department of Health and Environment pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Mississippi State Department of Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • National Association of Chronic Disease Directors pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • El Paso County Public Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Saint Louis University Prevention Research Center in St. Louis pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • School of Health Related Professions pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Active Living KC pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Washington University School of Medicine Division of Health Behavior Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • George Warren Brown School of Social Work pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Prevention Research Center in St — Washington University in St. Louis, Kansas Department of Health and Environment et Mississippi State Department of Health, avec 9 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Public Health Policies and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and Development

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.