Reliability of computed tomographic angiography 3‐D method of ruptured intracranial aneurysm measurements
Rattachement africain : hk, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aim With the availability of multidetector computed tomography, 3‐D display and measurements of cerebral aneurysms can be performed routinely. Although the 3‐D method is more intuitive, 3‐D measurements can be more operator dependent. Few data are available on interobserver variability and intraobserver reproducibility. We aimed to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability using both planar and 3‐D methods. Patients and Methods A total of 48 subarachnoid haemorrhage patients were recruited into the study. Results Aneurysm dimensions showed medium‐to‐large correlations among observers using the planar method, and large correlations for the 3‐D method. The average Kendall's tau b coefficients among observers of aneurysm dimensions were significantly better for 3‐D methods compared to the planar method. Excellent correlations in planar and 3‐D aneurysm dimensions were found between repeated measurements (Kendall's tau b coefficients: 0.90–0.97; all P < 0.001). Conclusion High interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found for 3‐D assessments of aneurysm dimensions in computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Thus, the 3‐D method of aneurysm measurement can provide a reliable CTA assessment for cerebral aneurysm and data comparisons among different studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reliability of computed tomographic angiography 3‐D method of ruptured intracranial aneurysm measurements
- Date Crossref
- 15/07/2013
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Chinese University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Prince of Wales Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Prince of Wales Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of Surgery Prince of Wales Hospital — Chinese University of Hong Kong et Prince of Wales Hospital.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.