Identification of Cyclic ADP-ribose-dependent Mechanisms in Pancreatic Muscarinic Ca2+ Signaling Using CD38 Knockout Mice
Rattachement africain : jp, cz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We showed that muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh)-stimulation increased the cellular content of cADPR in the pancreatic acinar cells from normal mice but not in those from CD38 knockout mice. By monitoring ACh-evoked increases in the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) using fura-2 microfluorimetry, we distinguished and characterized the Ca(2+) release mechanisms responsive to cADPR. The Ca(2+) response from the cells of the knockout mice (KO cells) lacked two components of the muscarinic Ca(2+) release present in wild mice. The first component inducible by the low concentration of ACh contributed to regenerative Ca(2+) spikes. This component was abolished by ryanodine treatment in the normal cells and was severely impaired in KO cells, indicating that the low ACh-induced regenerative spike responses were caused by cADPR-dependent Ca(2+) release from a pool regulated by a class of ryanodine receptors. The second component inducible by the high concentration of ACh was involved in the phasic Ca(2+) response, and it was not abolished by ryanodine treatment. Overall, we conclude that muscarinic Ca(2+) signaling in pancreatic acinar cells involves a CD38-dependent pathway responsible for two cADPR-dependent Ca(2+) release mechanisms in which the one sensitive to ryanodine plays a crucial role for the generation of repetitive Ca(2+) spikes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of Cyclic ADP-ribose-dependent Mechanisms in Pancreatic Muscarinic Ca2+ Signaling Using CD38 Knockout Mice
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2001
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.