Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2014 article

Refined histopathological predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2mutation status: a large-scale analysis of breast cancer characteristics from the BCAC, CIMBA, and ENIGMA consortia

126Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
137Institutions déclarées
15Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : au, us, gb, de, it, pl, dk, se, ca, es, fi, pk, nl, co, my. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: The distribution of histopathological features of invasive breast tumors in BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers differs from that of individuals with no known mutation. Histopathological features thus have utility for mutation prediction, including statistical modeling to assess pathogenicity of BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants of uncertain clinical significance. We analyzed large pathology datasets accrued by the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) to reassess histopathological predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, and provide robust likelihood ratio (LR) estimates for statistical modeling. METHODS: Selection criteria for study/center inclusion were estrogen receptor (ER) status or grade data available for invasive breast cancer diagnosed younger than 70 years. The dataset included 4,477 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 2,565 BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 47,565 BCAC breast cancer cases. Country-stratified estimates of the likelihood of mutation status by histopathological markers were derived using a Mantel-Haenszel approach. RESULTS: ER-positive phenotype negatively predicted BRCA1 mutation status, irrespective of grade (LRs from 0.08 to 0.90). ER-negative grade 3 histopathology was more predictive of positive BRCA1 mutation status in women 50 years or older (LR = 4.13 (3.70 to 4.62)) versus younger than 50 years (LR = 3.16 (2.96 to 3.37)). For BRCA2, ER-positive grade 3 phenotype modestly predicted positive mutation status irrespective of age (LR = 1.7-fold), whereas ER-negative grade 3 features modestly predicted positive mutation status at 50 years or older (LR = 1.54 (1.27 to 1.88)). Triple-negative tumor status was highly predictive of BRCA1 mutation status for women younger than 50 years (LR = 3.73 (3.43 to 4.05)) and 50 years or older (LR = 4.41 (3.86 to 5.04)), and modestly predictive of positive BRCA2 mutation status in women 50 years or older (LR = 1.79 (1.42 to 2.24)). CONCLUSIONS: These results refine likelihood-ratio estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status by using commonly measured histopathological features. Age at diagnosis is an important variable for most analyses, and grade is more informative than ER status for BRCA2 mutation carrier prediction. The estimates will improve BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification and inform patient mutation testing and clinical management.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Refined histopathological predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2mutation status: a large-scale analysis of breast cancer characteristics from the BCAC, CIMBA, and ENIGMA consortia
Date Crossref
23/12/2014
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteMayo ClinicUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of CologneUniversity Hospital CologneLeipzig UniversityTechnical University of MunichLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu KielUniversity Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of LübeckDüsseldorf University HospitalHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfHeidelberg UniversityUniversity Hospital HeidelbergUniversity Hospital UlmMedizinische Hochschule HannoverUniversity of MünsterUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität DresdenCharité - Universitätsmedizin BerlinManchester Academic Health Science CentreGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustInstitute of Cancer ResearchChapel Allerton HospitalSouthern General HospitalBirmingham Women's HospitalFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriRipamontiEuropean Institute of OncologyIFOMCentro di Riferimento OncologicoAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoUniversity of TurinUniversity of FlorenceOspedale Policlinico San MartinoAlleanza Contro il CancroThe University of SydneyWestmead Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of PennsylvaniaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversityMayo Clinic in ArizonaOdense University HospitalAarhus University HospitalKarolinska University HospitalLund UniversitySkåne University HospitalUniversity of New BrunswickMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteCanada Research ChairsCase Western Reserve UniversityCopenhagen University HospitalRigshospitaletHospital Clínico San CarlosInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San CarlosCity of HopeBeckman Research InstituteCancer Genetics (United States)University of HelsinkiHelsinki University HospitalIstituto Oncologico VenetoDana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterSpanish National Cancer Research CentreCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare DiseasesUniversity of UtahColumbia UniversityCedars-Sinai Medical CenterThe University of MelbourneGerman Cancer Research CenterShaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research CenterDKFZ-ZMBH AllianceKarolinska InstitutetThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversitätsklinikum ErlangenComprehensive Cancer Center ErlangenFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergUniversity of CopenhagenHerlev HospitalUniversität HamburgUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfNational Cancer InstituteDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of OncologyCancer Prevention Institute of CaliforniaStanford UniversityPontificia Universidad JaverianaKlinikum MittelbadenOlgahospitalStädtisches Klinikum KarlsruheLeiden University Medical CenterErasmus MC Cancer InstituteUniversity of SouthamptonQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of LondonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineUniversity of WestminsterMcMaster University Medical CentreJuravinski HospitalUniversity Health NetworkCancer Council VictoriaThe Alfred HospitalWestmead InstituteJohn Hunter HospitalUniversity of Newcastle AustraliaDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical PharmacologyUniversity of TübingenInstitute for Prevention and Occupational MedicineJohanniter-Krankenhaus BonnYorkshire Cancer ResearchUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Hawaiʻi at MānoaUniversity of Hawaii SystemCancer Research CenterNational Center for Tumor DiseasesUniversity of California, IrvineErasmus MCCancer ClinicKrebsregister SaarlandOulu University HospitalNordLabUniversity of OuluHospital Monte NarancoHospital Universitario La PazInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades RarasUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopio University HospitalUniversity of MalayaCancer Research MalaysiaSubang Jaya Medical CentreHuntsman Cancer Institute

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.