Characterization of Citrus Cultivars and Clones in Cyprus Through Microsatellite and RAPD Analysis
Rattachement africain : bg, cy. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Fifty one accessions from the Citrus collection of the Agricultural Research Institute, Lefcosia, Cyprus (ARI), representing 8 Citrus species, were analyzed with 10 microsatellite and 6 RAPD markers. Both, microsatellite and RAPD analyses, allowed the discrimination of the studied accessions at species level. A low level of polymorphism was obtained among cultivars within the species. In the group of oranges (6 cultivars and their clones), only one out of ten SSR primers discriminated between two groups of cultivars: the commercial cultivar Shamouti and two local cultivars, Jaffa and Aematousiki, on one hand and Valencia orange and the local orange Shekeriko on the other hand. In the group of lemons (3 cultivars and their clones) all three studied varieties, local Polyphori, local Lapithou and commercial Lisbon, were distinguished by one SSR and two RAPD primers. The local mandarin Arakapas (7 accessions) and Willowleaf showed complete genetic similarity by using both microsatellite and RAPD markers. The SSR markers did not reveal a polymorphism among the clones of the studied cultivars. Clone-specific RAPD markers were found for one clone of Frappa (4 accessions) and one clone of Bergamot (5 accessions). On the basis of the microsatellite data the local Cyprus cultivar Koumantantas was identified as Sour orange.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characterization of Citrus Cultivars and Clones in Cyprus Through Microsatellite and RAPD Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2008
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.