Electrogastrography in Pediatric Functional Dyspepsia
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the electrogastrographic patterns in children with functional dyspepsia and to investigate the correlations among electrogastrogram (EGG), gastric emptying (GE), and pain severity. METHODS: We studied 30 children (19 F; mean age 11.4 years) with functional dyspepsia. Electrogastrography was performed for 30 minutes fasting and for 1 hour during a GE test after ingestion of an isotope-labeled solid meal. The percent emptying was measured every 10 minutes for 1 hour after the meal. The dominant frequency of the EGG, the change in the postprandial peak power (deltaP), and percent dysrhythmia during each recording session were calculated. Specific symptoms were graded from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) by the patient. RESULTS: Of 30 patients, 14 (47%) had slow GE, and 15 (50%) had abnormal EGG (dysrhythmia > or = 30% or deltaP < 0). GE was slow in 73% of patients with an abnormal EGG but was slow in only 20% of patients with normal EGG (P = 0.009). GE was negatively correlated with fasting bradygastria (r = -0.383, P = 0.04). Abdominal pain was the most severe dyspeptic symptom, both during fasting and after the meal. Patients with an abnormal EGG had an increased mean pain severity score (3.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty percent of functional dyspepsia subjects had either slow GE or abnormal EGG. Patients with abnormal EGG were more likely to have slow GE. EGG abnormalities were associated with more severe postprandial pain and should be considered a possible mechanism for dyspeptic symptoms.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Electrogastrography in Pediatric Functional Dyspepsia
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2006
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.