Providers' responses to global budgeting in Taiwan: what were the initial effects?
Rattachement africain : tw, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Taiwan introduced National Health Insurance in 1995, providing comprehensive benefits to all of Taiwan's residents, with full access to providers and low co-payments. The programme quickly increased national health expenditure. To help contain these costs, Taiwan introduced global budgeting in 2000-02. Global budgeting may present incentives to hospitals to increase service volume to maximize revenue. We evaluated the response of hospitals to global budgeting by examining hospitalization for selected high-volume discretionary conditions, using National Health Insurance data from before and after the implementation of global budgeting. Hospitalization for these discretionary conditions increased significantly for children, adults of working age, and for some age groups of older adults. As there is no reason to believe that hospitalizations would have increased during the study period to fulfil unmet need, or as a function of either reduced outpatient access or notable increases in disease prevalence, results suggest that hospitals increased service volume to retain or expand their individual shares of the global budget. The increase in hospitalization for high-discretion conditions that we observed in this study may not be desirable, as hospitalization carries a substantial risk of iatrogenic morbidity, a risk that is particularly great for older people.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Providers' responses to global budgeting in Taiwan: what were the initial effects?
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2007
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Ministry of Health and Welfare pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
I-Shou University Department of Health Management pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of South Carolina Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Arnold School of Public Health Department of Health Services Policy and Management pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Department of Health Management — I-Shou University et Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics — University of South Carolina, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.