Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2013 article

Preliminary Experience With Social Media for Community Consultation and Public Disclosure in Exception From Informed Consent Trials

31Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Social Media as a Tool in Medicine 267 E ach year in the United States, >300 000 individuals suffer cardiopulmonary arrest and >2 000 000 suffer a serious traumatic injury requiring hospitalization.1,2 Clinical advances in these fields have been limited because of the paucity of scientific evidence guiding resuscitation practices.Prospective clinical trials are important for advancing the knowledge base in these areas, but because of the emergent nature of these conditions and the inability of critically ill subjects to provide informed consent, investigators must often conduct clinical trials of cardiac arrest and trauma under federal regulations for Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC).3 Editorial see p 206The US Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration have issued guidelines for the execution of clinical studies using the EFIC process.3 One of the key steps for EFIC research is community consultation and public disclosure (CC/PD), a process that connotes consultation between the investigative team, the appropriate institutional review boards, representatives of the communities where the research will be conducted, and communities likely to have the condition.However, the regulations provide little guidance on how to accomplish these key goals.Although traditional methods for CC/PD include public meetings and telephone-based surveys, the ability of these modalities to access the target populations, to effectively deliver information, and to elicit useful feedback remains unclear.4 Internet-based social media has emerged as a popular and powerful new modality for communication internationally.The objective of this study was to describe our preliminary experience using social media to facilitate the CC/PD process for cardiopulmonary arrest and trauma trials using EFIC. Methods Study DesignThe activities for this study, including the use of social media for CC/PD, were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.We devised a social media interface to facilitate the CC/PD process for cardiac arrest and major trauma trials conducted at the Alabama site of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). Study SettingROC is a collaboration of 10 sites in the United States and Canada dedicated to the study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and severe traumatic injury.5 The ROC catchment area includes a population of 23.7 million people over a coverage area of 35 500 sq miles and treats ≈11 900 nontraumatic emergency medical services-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests per year.6 The Alabama ROC site includes 10 emergency medical services agencies in the greater Birmingham, AL, community, encompassing a population of 650 000 people over 1300 sq miles and served by >1400 emergency medical services personnel.Social media as CC/PD was used for 2 ROC clinical trials.The ROC Continuous Chest Compressions (CCC) Trial is a multicenter, cluster, randomized trial comparing the 2 strategies of delivering cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compressions to victims of outof-hospital cardiac arrests: continuous chest compressions and traditional 30:2 interrupted chest compressions.4 The ROC Hypotensive Resuscitation (HYPO Resus) Trial is a prospective, randomized trial comparing standard and limited volume crystalloid fluid resuscitation in victims of hemorrhagic shock.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Preliminary Experience With Social Media for Community Consultation and Public Disclosure in Exception From Informed Consent Trials
Date Crossref
16/07/2013
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Alabama School of Medicine Department of Surgery (J.D.K.) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

University of Alabama at Birmingham et Department of Surgery (J.D.K.) — University of Alabama School of Medicine.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.