Wilms' tumor: A rational use of preoperative imaging
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a preoperative imaging protocol relying predominantly on a chest X-ray film (CXR) and ultrasound in patients with Wilms' tumor is adequate for patient management and to determine the frequency more sophisticated imaging, in particular, computed tomography (CT), is required. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study at a tertiary pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS: 60 consecutive patients with Wilms' tumor treated at our institution between 1980 and 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The preoperative imaging was recorded and 2- and 4-year survival were compared with the National Wilms' Tumor Study. RESULTS: 100% of patients had a preoperative CXR, 95% abdominal ultrasound, 5% abdominal CT, 13% chest CT, 47% abdominal X-ray, 2% aortography, 5% cavography, and 35% intravenous urography. The overall 2- and 4-year survivals of 92% and 90%, respectively, did not statistically differ from the National Wilms' Tumor Study 2- and 4-year survivals of 94% and 91%. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative imaging protocol relying predominantly on a CXR and abdominal ultrasound does not reduce survival. Other more sophisticated imaging, in particular, CT, is not required in the majority of cases and is warranted only when a CXR or ultrasound is unable to resolve relevant management problems.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Wilms' tumor: A rational use of preoperative imaging
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/1995
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.