The Renin-Angiotensin System in Patients with Repeated Anaphylactic Reactions during Hymenoptera Venom Hyposensitization and Sting Challenge
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Patients with a history of anaphylactic reactions to hymenoptera venom who tolerated the hyposensitization and the sting provocation without problems (n = 10) had angiotensin I (ANG I), angiotensin II (ANG II), angiotensinogen and renin similar to the values found in healthy nonallergic controls (n = 11). In contrast, patients who repeatedly experienced anaphylactic reactions during hyposensitization and who displayed anaphylactic reactions to sting provocation with a living insect (n = 6) showed significantly lower renin (p < 0.05), angiotensinogen (p < 0.05), ANG I (p < 0.05) and ANG II (p < 0.05) plasma levels as compared to healthy nonallergic controls (n = 11). Sting provocation with a living insect induced clinical symptoms of anaphylaxis in all of the 6 patients. A decrease in ANG I was found in 4 of the patients (67%) after provocation as compared to the concentration before the sting challenge. Angiotensinogen decreased in 3 of the patients (50%) whereas renin activity decreased in 2 of the patients (29%). In all cases a decrease in ANG II was noticed (100%). It is concluded that patients at high risk of developing anaphylactic reactions possess a dysfunctional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) which is not stimulated and does not respond appropriately. These findings point to an important role of the RAS as a defense mechanism in response to anaphylactic reactions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Renin-Angiotensin System in Patients with Repeated Anaphylactic Reactions during Hymenoptera Venom Hyposensitization and Sting Challenge
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2009
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.