Effect of localization of missense mutations in SCN1A on epilepsy phenotype severity
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Many missense mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel subunit gene SCN1A were identified in patients with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) and severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI), although GEFS+ is distinct from SMEI in terms of clinical symptoms, severity, prognosis, and responses to antiepileptic drugs. The authors analyzed the localization of missense mutations in SCN1A identified in patients with GEFS+ and SMEI to clarify the phenotype-genotype relationships. RESULTS: Mutations in SMEI occurred more frequently in the "pore" regions of SCN1A than did those in GEFS+. These SMEI mutations in the "pore" regions were more strongly associated than mutations in other regions with the presence of ataxia and tendency to early onset of disease. The possibility of participation of ion selectivity dysfunction of the channel in the pathogenesis of SMEI was suggested by a mutation in the pore region (R946C) identified in a SMEI patient. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant phenotype-genotype relationship in generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus and severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy with SCN1A missense mutations. More severe sodium channel dysfunctions including abnormal ion selectivity that are caused by mutations in the pore regions may be involved in the pathogenesis of SMEI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of localization of missense mutations in <i>SCN1A</i> on epilepsy phenotype severity
- Date Crossref
- 27/07/2004
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.