TRISOMY 16 MOSAICISM IN AMNIOTIC FLUID CELL CULTURES
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Trisomy 16 mosaicism was found in amniotic fluid cells in a patient undergoing amniocentesis because of elevated second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) (2.80 MOM), a markedly elevated human chorionic gonadotropin level (hCG) (12.02 MOM), and a Down syndrome risk of 1:55. Ultrasound evaluation of the fetus indicated the presence of an atrial septal defect and clinodactyly. Cytogenetic analyses of various fetal tissues using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) failed to detect substantial numbers of trisomy 16 cells; however, trisomy 16 mosaicism was identified in placental tissue. Molecular genetic analysis at five different loci [four analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and one by Southern blot analysis] failed to show any evidence for uniparental disomy. Although trisomy 16 cells could not be clearly demonstrated in the fetus, the presence of a clinically significant proportion of aneuploid cells early in development could not be excluded and it therefore cannot be assumed that a 'confined placental mosaicism' existed. The markedly elevated hCG and elevated MSAFP levels are consistent with abnormal placental function in trisomy 16 mosaicism. Serial ultrasound evaluation (to detect any late-onset growth retardation) and fetal echocardiography may be indicated for patients with extraordinarily high levels of hCG, especially if MSAFP is also elevated.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- TRISOMY 16 MOSAICISM IN AMNIOTIC FLUID CELL CULTURES
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/1996
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.