ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES OF EYES TREATED WITH A SUTURELESS SCLERAL FIXATION TECHNIQUE FOR INTRAOCULAR LENS PLACEMENT OR RESCUE
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In Brief Purpose: To report the 1 year results of a novel surgical technique for sutureless scleral fixation of a 3-piece intraocular lens. Methods: Retrospective consecutive series of patients who underwent sutureless scleral fixation of a three-piece intraocular lens. All patients were required to have at least 1 year of follow-up to be included in the series. Outcomes data were obtained and treated with simple statistical analyses. Results: A total of 24 patients were included in the study population. The average age was 75 years (range, 44–87). Short-term complications were few and included vitreous hemorrhage (n = 2), elevated intraocular pressure (n = 1), and hypotony (n = 1). Long-term complications included intraocular lens dislocation (n = 3) and cystoid macular edema (n = 1). Mean visual acuity improved from logMAR 1.30 (Snellen 20/399) to 0.52 (Snellen 20/66) at 1 year. Conclusion: This novel technique for sutureless scleral fixation of a three-piece intraocular lens was well-tolerated 1 year after surgery. The sutureless scleral fixation technique is a minimally invasive and efficient technique, allowing a three-piece intraocular lens to be implanted or rescued into a sulcus-based position without suture fixation. One year after surgery, this technique was well tolerated with minimal long-term complications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES OF EYES TREATED WITH A SUTURELESS SCLERAL FIXATION TECHNIQUE FOR INTRAOCULAR LENS PLACEMENT OR RESCUE
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2015
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.