Perception of phonemic and allophonic contrasts in English- and Spanish-learning infants.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Infants from monolingual English- and Spanish-speaking homes were compared in their perception of two phonetic contrasts that differ in their phonemic status in the two languages. The contrast [d]-[Ð] is phonemic in English but allophonic in Spanish; while the contrast [d]-flap is phonemic in Spanish but allophonic in English. Infants ranged from 6 to 16 months of age. Each infant was tested on discrimination of both contrasts. For half of the infants the stimuli were produced by a Spanish speaker, while for the other half of the infants the stimuli were produced by an English speaker. Data collection from Spanish-learning infants is still in progress. However, preliminary results indicate that infants in the youngest age group (6–8 months) are able to discriminate the [d]-flap contrast regardless of infant language background, while the [d]-[Ð] contrast is discriminated poorly at this age in both language groups. English-learning infants lose sensitivity to the allophonic [d]-flap contrast with age, and it is not until 14–16 months that discrimination of the phonemic [d]-[Ð] contrast improves in these infants. Spanish-learning infants are expected to remain proficient at discriminating the phonemic [d]-flap as they age and to remain poor at discriminating the allophonic [d]-[Ð] contrast. [Work supported by NIH1R03HD048538 to JM.]
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Perception of phonemic and allophonic contrasts in English- and Spanish-learning infants.
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2009
- Éditeur
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.