MANAGING PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (PD) — FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENTS' MODIFICATION OF THEIR RECOMMENDED DIALYSIS REGIMEN. A EUROPEAN STUDY OF 376 PATIENTS
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the prevalence and extent of missed peritoneal dialysis (PD) exchanges and to identify possible predictors for regimen modification. DESIGN: The study was a cross sectional postal survey of PD patients. Patients were asked to complete a single questionnaire looking at factors that influenced their management of the prescribed regimen. PATIENTS: 551 patients were invited to participate in the study from 17 centres across three European countries; 10 centres from Belgium, 5 from Italy and 2 from the UK. Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), CAPD and Quantum, or automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) for more than three months and at least 18 years old were included in the study. 376 out of 551 questionnaires were completed; a response rate of 68%. RESULTS: 20% (n=67) of those who responded to the questionnaire admitted to modifying their treatment in the previous month. Those who were more likely to modify their treatment were younger, employed, had greater contact with the PD team, were on APD 10 hours or longer and were less satisfied with their APD treatment. CONCLUSION: Many of the patients self-reported modifying their dialysis regimen and possible predictors were highlighted from this study. By trying to identifying individual patients who do modify treatment healthcare professionals can target information that can support the patient in making safer treatment modification choices.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- MANAGING PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (PD) — FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENTS' MODIFICATION OF THEIR RECOMMENDED DIALYSIS REGIMEN. A EUROPEAN STUDY OF 376 PATIENTS
- Date Crossref
- 12/10/2006
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.