Comparison of wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Coaxially sighted corneal-light-reflex versus line-of-sight centration

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: To compare refractive outcomes, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and contrast sensitivity of myopic wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or on the line of sight. SETTING: Okamoto Eye Clinic, Ehime, Japan. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Data at 3 months were compared based on the distance between the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex and the line of sight (P-distance) as follows: distance greater than 0.25 mm (high-distance group), distance greater than 0.15 mm and less than 0.25 mm (intermediate-distance group), and distance less than 0.15 mm (low distance group). RESULTS: The chart review included 317 eyes in the corneal-light-reflex group and 269 eyes in the line-of-sight group. The mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was +0.123 diopter (D) ± 0.378 (SD) and +0.187 ± 0.480 D, respectively (P = .07). The safety and efficacy indices were significantly higher in the corneal-light-reflex group, including the high-distance subgroup and eyes with a P-distance less than 0.25 mm (P<.05, all cases). The HOAs (P<.001) and coma (P = .001) were significantly higher in the line-of-sight group (P<.001 and P = .001, respectively). The line-of-sight group had a significantly greater change in contrast sensitivity (P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex resulted in better safety, effectiveness, and contrast sensitivity than line-of-sight centration. Centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex was safer for myopic eyes with P-distances greater than 0.25 mm. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.