Mitoxantrone, Etoposide and Prednisolone (NOVEP) in Previously Untreated Elderly Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and as Salvage Therapy for Refractory NHL
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) are often excluded from or underrepresented in clinical trials of combination chemotherapy regimens because of toxicity of the treatment. Materials and Methods: We report our results in a cohort of 32 patients aged over 60 years who received mitoxantrone, etoposide and prednisolone as first-line therapy and of another 14 patients with relapsed NHL as salvage therapy. 26 patients had high-grade NHL and 20 had low-grade NHL. Advanced stage was defined as Ann Arbor stages 3 and 4 and was seen in 38 patients. Results: Patients with NOVEP as first-line therapy achieved 41% complete remissions (CR) and 34% partial remissions (PR), leading to an overall response rate of 75%. Event-free 3-year survival was 29% in this subgroup. Pretreated patients achieved only 7% CR and 14% PR. Two patients died of treatment-related side effects. Conclusions: The combination of mitoxantrone, etoposide and prednisolone is successful in non-pretreated elderly patients with NHL and shows only low toxicity especially for this subgroup, even in advanced stages. It is of minor success as salvage therapy for older patients with relapsed NHL.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mitoxantrone, Etoposide and Prednisolone (NOVEP) in Previously Untreated Elderly Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and as Salvage Therapy for Refractory NHL
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2009
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.