PS2-19: Characterizing Primary Care Visits: Explaining Variation in the Evaluation and Management Visit Level
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstracts 15.8% received help with their medications versus 4.8% among those without limitations (P <0.001).Overall, 17% reported a cost-reducing behavior, 3% non-adherence, and 8% financial stress due to drug costs; these behaviors were more common among beneficiaries with functional limitations.In multivariate analyses, beneficiaries with 3+ functional limitations who did not receive help with their medications had higher rates of cost-related non-adherence (OR = 6.06, 95% CI: 1.71-21.51)and financial stress (OR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.73-9.51)than those without limitations and without help with their medications.Beneficiaries with 3+ functional limitations who received help with their medications were also more likely to experience financial stress (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.13-6.98).However, there were no significant differences in the odds of general non-adherence compared with beneficiaries who did not receive help.Conclusions: Beneficiaries with functional limitations frequently report receiving informal support with their medication regimens and cost-related drug use behavior changes.Among beneficiaries with multiple limitations, those receiving assistance were less likely to reduce adherence.Support with self-care activities for beneficiaries with limited functional status could improve adherence and outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- PS2-19: Characterizing Primary Care Visits: Explaining Variation in the Evaluation and Management Visit Level
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2013
- Éditeur
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.