Cerebral Ischemia in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats with Type 2 (Noninsulin-Dependent) Diabetes mellitus, Cerebral Blood Flow and Tissue Metabolism
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The present study was designed to examine the effect of chronic type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus on cerebral blood flow and metabolism during cerebral ischemia induced by bilateral carotid artery occlusion in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Diabetes was produced by streptozotocin treatment in 2-day neonates and the experiment was performed at the age of 5 months. The level of mean arterial pressure was not different between diabetic and nondiabetic rats. At 1 h after ischemia, cerebral blood flow was decreased to 1% of the resting value and supratentorial lactate was increased by 8-fold of control, being virtually the same in both groups of rats. In contrast, reduction of cerebral ATP was much less in diabetic rats (1.64 +/- 0.15 mmol/kg) than in nondiabetic rats (0.74 +/- 0.07 mmol/kg) (p less than 0.001); ATP in nonischemic control is 2.80-2.85 mmol/kg. These results could not be explained by the difference in cerebral blood flow between the groups during ischemia. The results suggest that chronic mild hyperglycemia exerts rather a protective effect on the brain against ischemic insult. Effective utilization of metabolites, such as glucose and ketone bodies, may play an important role to minimize metabolic derangements in the ischemic brain in type 2 diabetic-hyperglycemic rats.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cerebral Ischemia in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats with Type 2 (Noninsulin-Dependent) Diabetes mellitus, Cerebral Blood Flow and Tissue Metabolism
- Date Crossref
- 07/04/2009
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.