Inpatient management of gout in a New Zealand hospital: a retrospective audit
Rattachement africain : nz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIM: To review inpatient management of acute gout in a New Zealand hospital. METHODS: A retrospective file review of all acute episodes of gout at Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand over a 1 year period. RESULTS: In the course of a year, there were 90 admissions for, or complicated by, acute gout. In 31 cases, gout was the primary diagnosis. Median length of stay was 5 days and readmissions were common. The majority of patients (87%) were known to have gout before admission, yet only 50% of these patients were on uric acid lowering treatment. Serum urate was measured in only 60% of patients with a mean level of 0.471 mmol/L. Treatment for the acute attack was evenly split between monotherapy (49%) and polytherapy (49%). Treatment modalities used were: prednisone (61%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (40%), colchicine (40%), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) (15%) and intrarticular steroids (7%). Patients were generally treated in a timely manner with few patients experiencing delays. Patients seen by the Rheumatology Department were more likely to receive polytherapy, be treated with intra-articular steroids or ACTH and to start allopurinol. The 'treat-to-target' approach to the management of elevated serum urate was mentioned in only 9% of cases. CONCLUSION: There was considerable variability in the investigation and management of acute gout, with significant deviation from published protocols. The 'treat-to-target' approach to the management of elevated urate has not yet been widely adopted by the physicians in this New Zealand hospital.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Inpatient management of gout in a New Zealand hospital: a retrospective audit
- Date Crossref
- 15/04/2015
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.