Endocrine Pancreas in the Rat Model of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency
Rattachement africain : us, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A new technique to obstruct the pancreatic ducts was developed by injecting zein solution into the common bile duct of the rat. Four weeks after the injection, the fate of the endocrine pancreas was investigated by studying (a) pancreatic content of four pancreatic hormones, (b) histology and immunohistochemistry of the pancreas, (c) i.v. glucose tolerance and i.v. insulin tolerance tests for monitoring plasma glucose, insulin, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) levels in vivo, and (d) in vitro perifusion of pancreatic tissue slices to assess insulin and PP secretion. In zein-injected rats, the total pancreatic content of insulin, glucagon, PP, and somatostatin was reduced to 80, 70, 40, and 20%, respectively, of the corresponding controls. In response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, the plasma PP levels rose to about one-half that of the controls. By contrast, perifused zein-injected rat pancreases released several times more PP than the controls in response to carbachol stimulation. In zein-injected rats, total pancreatic protein was reduced to 20% of the controls and pancreatic amylase was almost absent, reflecting practically complete loss of acinar tissue. Thus, this experimental model appears to be suitable for producing chronic pancreatic insufficiency in the rat and provides a useful model for studying both endocrine and exocrine functions in the small rodent.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endocrine Pancreas in the Rat Model of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/1988
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.