Removal of the ballistocardiographic artifact from EEG–fMRI data: a canonical correlation approach
Rattachement africain : be, it, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The simultaneous recording of electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can give new insights into how the brain functions. However, the strong electromagnetic field of the MR scanner generates artifacts that obscure the EEG and diminish its readability. Among them, the ballistocardiographic artifact (BCGa) that appears on the EEG is believed to be related to blood flow in scalp arteries leading to electrode movements. Average artifact subtraction (AAS) techniques, used to remove the BCGa, assume a deterministic nature of the artifact. This assumption may be too strong, considering the blood flow related nature of the phenomenon. In this work we propose a new method, based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and blind source separation (BSS) techniques, to reduce the BCGa from simultaneously recorded EEG-fMRI. We optimized the method to reduce the user's interaction to a minimum. When tested on six subjects, recorded in 1.5 T or 3 T, the average artifact extracted with BSS-CCA and AAS did not show significant differences, proving the absence of systematic errors. On the other hand, when compared on the basis of intra-subject variability, we found significant differences and better performance of the proposed method with respect to AAS. We demonstrated that our method deals with the intrinsic subject variability specific to the artifact that may cause averaging techniques to fail.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Removal of the ballistocardiographic artifact from EEG–fMRI data: a canonical correlation approach
- Date Crossref
- 25/02/2009
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Ghent University Department of Electronics and Information Systems pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Politecnico di Milano pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Medical Center Utrecht Department of Clinical Neurophysiology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Department of Biomedical Engineering pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Department of Electronics and Information Systems — Ghent University, Politecnico di Milano et Department of Clinical Neurophysiology — University Medical Center Utrecht, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.