Urinary Alkalinisation with Oral Sodium Bicarbonate for Patients at Risk of Contrast‐Induced Nephropathy
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Background Intravenous sodium bicarbonate is used to reduce the risk of contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN). Intravenous sodium bicarbonate is inconvenient and requires inpatient hospital resources, while oral sodium bicarbonate is less costly and easy‐to‐use. Aim To determine whether oral sodium bicarbonate has a similar effect on urinary pH as intravenous sodium bicarbonate in patients at risk of CIN. Method This sequential crossover study was conducted in patients from the cardiology and renal units scheduled for a non‐emergency contrast‐enhanced procedure. Participants received intravenous sodium bicarbonate 150 mmol/L at 3 mL/kg/h, 1 hour prior, then 1 mL/kg/h during and for 6 hours after the procedure. Participants returned to the hospital 2 to 3 weeks after their procedure to receive oral sodium bicarbonate capsules (16 times 840 mg, 160 mmol) over 7 hours with 1 L of water. Urinary pH was measured before and after the administration of intravenous and oral sodium bicarbonate. Results 9 participants completed the study. Mean urinary pH after oral sodium bicarbonate was 6.6 (SD 0.6) versus 6.9 (SD 0.5) for intravenous sodium bicarbonate. The mean change in urinary pH was 0.9 (SD 0.7) with oral sodium bicarbonate versus 0.8 (SD 0.5) for intravenous sodium bicarbonate. The difference in change in urinary pH was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). Conclusion Oral sodium bicarbonate has a similar effect on urinary pH as intravenous sodium bicarbonate in patients at risk of CIN.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Urinary Alkalinisation with Oral Sodium Bicarbonate for Patients at Risk of Contrast‐Induced Nephropathy
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2012
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.