A Genetic Defect in Retention of Potassium by Streptococcus faecalis*
Résumé fourni par la source
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTA Genetic Defect in Retention of Potassium by Streptococcus faecalis*F. M. Harold, Ruth L. Harold, J. R. Baarda, and A. AbramsCite this: Biochemistry 1967, 6, 6, 1777–1784Publication Date (Print):June 1, 1967Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 June 1967https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi00858a028https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00858a028research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views27Altmetric-Citations41LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- A Genetic Defect in Retention of Potassium by Streptococcus faecalis<sup>*</sup>
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/1967
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.