Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for the analysis of gut microbiota in fishes
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study investigated the impacts of bacterial DNA extraction methodology on downstream analysis of fish gut microbiota. Feces and intestine samples were taken from three sympatric freshwater fish species with varying diets. Samples were processed immediately (approximately 4 h after capture; fresh), stored at -20 °C for 15 days or preserved in RNAlater® reagent for 15 days. DNA was then extracted using two commercial kits: one designed for animal tissues and one specifically formulated for stool samples. Microbial community fingerprints were generated using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Factors including diversity as depicted by band number, band intensity, repeatability and practicalities such as cost and time were considered. Despite significant differences in microbiota structure, results were similar between feces and intestine samples. Frozen samples were consistently outperformed by other storage methods and the stool kit typically outperformed the tissue kit. Overall, we recommend extraction of bacterial DNA from fresh samples using the stool kit for both sample types. If samples cannot be processed immediately, preservation in RNAlater® is preferred to freezing. Choice of DNA extraction method significantly influences the results of downstream microbial community analysis and thus should be taken into consideration for metadata analysis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for the analysis of gut microbiota in fishes
- Date Crossref
- 04/12/2014
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Auburn University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Fisheries Aquatic Microbiology Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory, Auburn University et Aquatic Microbiology Laboratory — School of Fisheries.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.