Feasibility of Uranium Detection Through Container Walls Using Ultrahigh-Energy X-ray Fluorescence

Résumé fourni par la source

The quantitative analysis of uranium in spent nuclear fuel is at best a challenging task, even for the specialized laboratories designed to handle such materials. The reason this measurement is important is the need to account for all nuclear materials under the control of international safeguards agreements. Although there are existing methods employed for this measurement, efforts to improve the accuracy of nuclear material accountability are of continuing interest. A new approach for making such measurements involves ultrahigh-energy X-ray fluorescence (UHEXRF). UHEXRF is defined in this application as XRF above 80 keV. Although there have been previous efforts exploring the use of high-energy XRF, almost all these have dealt with XRF below 80 keV [1]. The appeal of using UHEXRF for quantitative analysis of uranium in spent nuclear fuel is primarily focused on the very penetrating X rays of the fluorescent radiation [2]. In the case of uranium, the Kα line is at 98.428 keV with an absorption edge energy of 115.591 keV. At these energies, both the exciting and fluorescent radiations can penetrate significant shielding. In this particular case, the Zircaloy (zirconium metal alloy) cladding of nuclear fuel rods provides a significant barrier to most spectroscopic elemental analysis methods. For excitation energies just above the uranium K edge, the calculated penetration depth is on the order of several hundred micrometers into a UO2 nuclear fuel pellet after penetrating a 600 µm thick Zircaloy cladding wall. The ability to penetrate the cladding wall and the pellet offers an opportunity to measure the uranium nondestructively through the container walls with typical XRF accuracy and precision. The ability to measure the U content directly through the container wall offers a simple analytical protocol because (a) there would be no sample preparation, (b) the analyte is measured directly, and (c) the matrix and mineralogical effects are reduced. In addition, at this high energy, there are few if any line overlaps, which simplifies the spectrometry measurements. By using a restricted or focused X-ray beam for excitation, spatially resolved elemental distributions within the fuel rod can be obtained, whether it is fresh nuclear fuel or spent nuclear fuel. This article presents the feasibility of employing UHEXRF for qualitative and quantitative elemental analysis of uranium in nuclear fuel surrogates and demonstrates nondestructive, through-container-wall analyses. The samples used in this study were created in the laboratory using depleted uranium solutions from a stock 10,000 μg/mL commercial standard (High Purity Standards, Charleston, SC). The calibration samples were prepared by depositing known concentrations with a pipet, typically 1 μL, onto a Kapton film substrate. Two types of samples were prepared: one was an acidified aqueous-based matrix with known uranium concentrations, whereas in the second set the uranium solution was spiked into a synthetic spent fuel (SSF) matrix. The SSF matrix is a mixture of nearly 50 elements typically found in spent nuclear fuel, each with a mass of 100 ng. The deposited uranium ranged from 10,000 ng to 1 ng in the dried spot residue of the 1 μL drop. These samples were used to generate a calibration plot for the uranium intensity versus the known U mass. In each case the deposit was mapped by sequentially moving the probe beam over an area larger than the visible deposit. This approach was used to ensure the entire deposit was measured. The samples were doubly sealed in Kapton film to ensure no possible leaks of radioactive material. A mock fuel rod sample was fabricated within an 8 mm diameter Zircaloy alloy tube, 25 mm long, with a wall thickness of 600 µm. Mock fuel pellets were made by mixing UO2 and ThO2 in known masses to generate several different UO2 compositions within the mock fuel pellets. In this instance the uranium is a surrogate for plutonium, whereas the thorium is a surrogate for the typical uranium fuel matrix. The pellets were mixed with stearic acid as a binder and pressed into 8 mm diameter pellets, 2 mm thick. The pellets were loaded into the Zircaloy tube and sealed with silicone glue, then encapsulated with Kapton film. The measurements were done on the 6-ID-D beam line of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory. This beam line can produce monochromatic excitation from 50 keV to 150 keV with a ΔE/E = 1.4 × 10−4 and a photon flux of 1 × 1011 photons per second at 130 keV. In this work an excitation energy of ~117 keV was used to effectively excite uranium above the K absorption edge of 115.591 keV. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The samples were mounted on multiple axis stages to accurately position the sample for single point spectra, line scans, and elemental maps. End-on view of the UHEXRF experimental setup at APS 6-ID-D beam line, which shows the sample mounted on multiple translation stages for positioning of the sample, a camera to observe sample location, detector, and in the upper-left background the entrance of the synchrotron beam. The beam size was controlled by programmable slits. Elemental maps were acquired by stepping the beam over a selected area and recording a full spectrum at each point. The dried spot deposits were collected using a 500 µm beam spot size with a 500 µm step size in both x and y directions with a 5-second dwell time. The mock fuel rod was mapped using a 100 µm beam spot and 100 µm steps in x and y with a 3 second dwell time. The programmable slits allow selectable spot sizes down to 25 µm. A high-purity germanium detector (Canberra model GL0110S) with a resolution of around 1 keV, equipped with digital signal processor and acquisition interface module electronics, was used to collect the emitted X-ray fluorescence. In-house APS (EPICS) software was used to control the data acquisition. The data was processed with user-developed Matlab scripts to calibrate each spectrum, fit the peaks, remove background, and generate net intensities used for creating elemental maps. Of particular concern was the overlap from the Compton scatter peak, which was centered ~87 keV. The wings of the Compton peak extended for 1–2 keV on either side of the centroid and thus must be removed before each spectrum is processed. Figure 2 shows the measured spectrum and the background. This full spectrum illustrates the separation of the typical low-energy spectra normally used to characterize U L-series at 13.6 keV compared with the UHEXRF U Kα1 line at ~98 keV used in this work. The Compton scatter peak along with the tails is visible at ~87 keV. Full UHEXRF spectrum of an aqueous uranium dried spot residue showing both low- and high-energy U lines, which have been labeled. The red line designates the UHEXRF cutoff energy of 80 keV. Figure 3 shows an overlay of a bare uranium spectrum (solid line) with a spectrum acquired with 1.3 mm of Zircaloy shielding (dashed line) in front of the sample. The Zircaloy shielding decreases the uranium signal by almost 80%, and there is a significant increase in Compton scatter. However, the uranium peaks are still clearly visible, even with twice the nominal thickness of conventional nuclear fuel rod cladding. Thus the detection of uranium in typical nuclear fuel rods is quite feasible. UHEXRF spectrum overlay of uranium for a bare sample (solid line) and a 1.3 mm thick Zircaloy shielded sample (dashed line). This thickness is twice the normal thickness of nuclear fuel rod cladding. The U signal decreases by almost 80% with the Zircaloy shielding, however the U signal is still detected. An example of one of the uranium maps of the dried residue deposits is shown in Figure 4. The total uranium mass in the deposit is around 99 ng. The elemental map indicates the residue is not uniform with several hot spots. However by summing the region of interest for the uranium peak over all the pixels in the elemental map, a su

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.