MPs question health chiefs over troubled NHS computer programme
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Up to 5% to 10% of cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may actually be hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) that has been erroneously diagnosed. The hypothesis of this study is that exposure to a feather-filled duvet or pillow can be a cause of pulmonary fibrosis that is erroneously diagnosed as IPF. Material and methods: Between 2004 and 2010, 318 consecutive patients were studied. The diagnosis was based on internationally established criteria. Emphasis was placed on detecting transitory exposure to a possible environmental agent, particularly the use of a feather duvet or pillow. Furthermore, in patients whose questioning revealed exposure to an uncommon causal antigen or low-intensity exposure, specific IgG to antigen extract was determined, and specific bronchial challenge (SBC) were carried out. Surgical lung biopsies (SLB) were reviewed. Results: 60 patients were diagnosed with IPF. 24 patients had previous contact with a feather duvet or pillow for at least one year. In 15 patients the final diagnosis was HP; 8 by SBC and 2 by characteristic pathologic findings. HP was diagnosed in 3 patients with atypical usual interstitial pneumonia in SLB+ positive IgG testing and in 2 patients with bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis (>20%) and positive specific IgG to the causal agent. In 36 patients without previous contact, HP was diagnosed in 8 patients. Conclusion: In IPF, thorough clinical questioning can reveal the existence of a low-intensity, but persistent exposure to a known causal agent. HP due to exposure to a feather duvet can be the cause of some cases of pulmonary fibrosis, a condition that can have different prognosis. This abstract in funded in part by Fis PI1001577
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- MPs question health chiefs over troubled NHS computer programme
- Date Crossref
- 24/05/2011
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.