Syndecan-1 Expression in Gallbladder Cancer and Its Prognostic Significance
Résumé fourni par la source
AIM: To determine whether the immunohistochemical detection of syndecan-1 could provide useful information as a novel therapeutic or prognostic factor in primary gallbladder (GB) cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three GB cancer tissues were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for syndecan-1 expression. The relationship between syndecan-1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics, and the univariate survival analysis for the influence of the syndecan-1 expression on the overall survival were analysed. RESULTS: Epithelial syndecan-1 immunoreactivity was observed in 25 (58.1%) of the 43 GB cancer cases. The tumors with a positive syndecan-1 expression more frequently showed lymph node metastasis (p = 0.037). Although there was no statistically significant association, the tumors with a positive syndecan-1 expression tended to show a deeper invasion depth (p = 0.087) and more frequent lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.064). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that patients with positive syndecan-1 expression had a significantly shorter survival time than those patients with negative syndecan-1 expression (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of GB cancers revealed an epithelial overexpression of syndecan-1, which was associated with a progressive pathological feature and an aggressive clinical course. Therefore, epithelial syndecan-1 expression may be a predictor for a poor prognosis in patients with GB cancer.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Syndecan-1 Expression in Gallbladder Cancer and Its Prognostic Significance
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2008
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.