Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma

Le résumé fourni par la source

Advanced melanoma has a poor prognosis and chemotherapy provides little benefit for most patients. This may be related to heterogeneity of chemosensitivity as well as frequent constitutive resistance to individual cytotoxic drugs. We have therefore examined the heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in metastatic cutaneous melanoma specimens using an ex vivo ATP-based chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). Melanoma deposits (n=55) in skin or lymph node were tested using the ATP-TCA, performed in three separate laboratories. Analysis of the data collected (based on an arbitrary sensitivity index < 300) shows considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity. The most active single cytotoxic agents in the assay were identified as cisplatin, treosulfan, paclitaxel, vinblastine, gemcitabine and mitoxantrone. There was also a limited direct inhibition of melanoma cell growth by interferon-alpha2b, although this agent is known to have a number of indirect biological antitumor effects. Exposure of tumor cells to combinations of drugs at the concentrations tested as single agents showed the most active combinations to be treosulfan+gemcitabine, cisplatin+paclitaxel and vinblastine+paclitaxel. There was considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity: some tumors responded well to one agent or combination, while others showed no response to this and instead responded to one of the alternatives tested. Occasional highly resistant tumors showed no response to any of the single agents or combinations tested. The degree of heterogeneity observed suggests that the ATP-TCA could be used to select patients who might benefit from specific chemotherapeutic agents alone or in combination. This provides the rationale for future randomized controlled trials of ATP-TCA-directed chemotherapy versus physician's choice to determine whether assay-directed chemotherapy can improve patient response and survival.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.