BOLD (Beef in an Optimal Lean Diet) Effects on Established and Emerging Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors: Study Design and Planning
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Several clinical trials have shown that the incorporation of lean red meat in a Step I or AHA diet does not attenuate the reduction of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, epidemiologic data consistently correlates increased red meat consumption with increased incidence of CVD. Recent trials also have shown beneficial effects of a diet containing moderate protein (PRO) levels (mainly from plant sources). The BOLD (Beef in an Optimal Lean Diet) Study is a randomized, four period, crossover controlled feeding study designed to compare the effects of the average American diet with the DASH diet (50% carbohydrates [CHO], 18% PRO, 38% fat, 2–3oz lean red meat), a heart healthy diet rich in lean red meat (BOLD; 50% CHO, 18% PRO, 28% fat, 5–7oz lean red meat), and a moderate PRO diet also rich in lean red meat (BOLD+; 44% CHO, 28% PRO, 28% fat, 5–7oz lean red meat) on blood lipids, lipoproteins, and emerging risk factors for CVD. Eighty men and women (BMI 18.5–37m/kg 2 ) will be split into two distinct populations, moderately hypercholesterolemic (LDL‐C between the 50th and 90th percentile) and moderately hypertriglyceridemic (TG>150 mg/dL). We hypothesize that the BOLD and BOLD+ diets will yield changes in LDL‐C similar to that seen during the DASH diet period. We also hypothesize that the BOLD and BOLD+ diet periods will produce better effects on HDL‐C, TG and glucose homeostasis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- BOLD (Beef in an Optimal Lean Diet) Effects on Established and Emerging Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors: Study Design and Planning
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2008
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Pennsylvania State University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Nutritional Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Biobehavioral Health pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Pennsylvania State University, Nutritional Sciences et Biobehavioral Health.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.