A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN THE ADVERTISEMENT CALL OF THE GRAY TREEFROG,HYLA VERSICOLOR
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Genetic variation in sexual displays is crucial for an evolutionary response to sexual selection, but can be eroded by strong selection. Identifying the magnitude and sources of additive genetic variance underlying sexually selected traits is thus an important issue in evolutionary biology. We conducted a quantitative genetics experiment with gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) to investigate genetic variances and covariances among features of the male advertisement call. Two energetically expensive traits showed significant genetic variation: call duration, expressed as number of pulses per call, and call rate, represented by its inverse, call period. These two properties also showed significant genetic covariance, consistent with an energetic constraint to call production. Combining the genetic variance-covariance matrix with previous estimates of directional sexual selection imposed by female preferences predicts a limited increase in call duration but no change in call rate despite significant selection on both traits. In addition to constraints imposed by the genetic covariance structure, an evolutionary response to sexual selection may also be limited by high energetic costs of long-duration calls and by preferences that act most strongly against very short-duration calls. Meanwhile, the persistence of these preferences could be explained by costs of mating with males with especially unattractive calls.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN THE ADVERTISEMENT CALL OF THE GRAY TREEFROG,<i>HYLA VERSICOLOR</i>
- Date Crossref
- 13/04/2014
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
College of Charleston Department of Biology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Missouri Division of Biological Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Biology — College of Charleston et Division of Biological Sciences — University of Missouri.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.