The Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Other Verotoxin-Producing E. coli in Raw, Ground Beef Samples from Wet Markets in Laguna, Philippines
Résumé fourni par la source
Forty raw, ground beef samples were collected from wet markets in 15 towns of Laguna, Philippines. The samples were enriched using Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) containing cefixime, cefsulodin and vancomycin and were plated out on Cefixime-Tellurite Sorbitol MacConkey Agar (CT-SMAC). Four hundred presumptive isolates were obtained and screened for typical E. coli O157:H7 characteristics. Two isolates (B2S7-6 and B4S3-6) were determined to be Escherichia coli exhibiting typical E. coli O157:H7 characteristics based on morphological and biochemical tests. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the E. coli DASTM Kit (BIOTECH) likewise confirmed these isolates to be E. coli. However, none of the isolates was found to possess the O157 antigen using the O157 Latex Agglutination Kit (Oxoid®). The isolates were also tested for genes coding for shiga-like toxin 1 (slt I) and shiga-like toxin 2 (slt II) using PCR and slt I and slt II primers, respectively. Both isolates were negative for slt I but positive for slt II. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef collected from wet markets in Laguna was 0%. However, the prevalence of non-sorbitol-fermenting, non-β-glucuronidase-producing E. coli in the collected samples was 5%. The prevalence of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing non-O157 E. coli in the beef samples was 5%.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Other Verotoxin-Producing E. coli in Raw, Ground Beef Samples from Wet Markets in Laguna, Philippines
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2013
- Éditeur
- College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.