Aller au contenu principal
2006 article

Distributed Mission Operations Within-Simulator Training Effectiveness Baseline Study. Volume 3. Real-Time and Blind Expert Subjective Assessments of Learning

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

The current work documented in this report is the subject matter expert (SME) rating data from a large study examining the within-simulator learning benefits of Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) training as described in AFRL-HE-AZ-TR-2006-0015 Vol I, Distributed Mission Operations Within-Simulator Training Effectiveness Baseline Study: Summary Report. That study examined 76 participating F-16 four-ship teams in week-long DMO training exercises and compared beginning-of-week to end-of-week performance on mirror-image air combat scenarios. As a major assessment component to the overall study, the current work reports data we collected from SME ratings of pilot performance. Two SME rating methods were employed -- real-time ratings (i.e., done during mission execution) and SME ratings captured later using a scientific "blind" protocol. Comparing SME ratings of performance on the mirror-image scenarios revealed highly significant performance increases as a function of DMO training. SME real-time and blind ratings were both found to be significantly higher for end-of-week scenarios. The fact that the real-time and blind rater results corroborated one another provides strong support that performance greatly improved as a function of DMO training. Lastly, though the real-time ratings are not as scientific as the blind ratings, the fact that the blind ratings revealed very similar results to the real-time ratings greatly increases our confidence for continuing to use real-time ratings to assess performance. Compared to implementing an ongoing blind rating system, this justification to use real-time ratings creates a significant logistical, time, and financial savings for future research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyAerospace and Aviation TechnologyIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.