Bjørn Sætrevik

What Pilot Studies Can (and Cannot) Do for Validity in Psychological Research

Yashvin Seetahul, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Caroline Zygar-Hoffmann, Lukas Wallrich et autres

Recent debates about psychology’s credibility have renewed attention to validity threats. We argue that pilot studies can function as methodological due diligence by improving early decisions about design, measurement, manipulation, sampling, and analysis prior to a main study. We examine four types …

A call for greater transparency in piloting

Isaac J Handley-Miner, Agata Bochyńska, Brett Buttliere, Kai Li Chung et autres

A pilot study is a preliminary investigation conducted before a full-scale research study. Although piloting is a common and valuable part of the research process, pilot studies are not systematically reported (or even acknowledged) in the psychology literature. This paper argues that …

Evaluate what is claimed to be confirmed: Initial version of a falsification assessment form (FAF)

Michael Höfler, Anja Kräplin, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Moritz Schepke et autres

Scientific claims, and the way they are tested must be unambiguous and flexibility must be disclosed. Grounded in Popper’s principle of falsification, we suggest the Falsification Assessment Form. The form aims to identify ambiguity and undisclosed flexibility in the entire research process …

de, gb, it, at, no, hu (code pays fourni par la source)

Evaluate what is claimed to be confirmed: Initial version of a falsification assessment form (FAF)

Michael Höfler, Anja Kräplin, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Moritz Schepke et autres

Scientific claims, and the way they are tested must be unambiguous and flexibility must be disclosed. Grounded in Popper’s principle of falsification, we suggest the Falsification Assessment Form. The form aims to identify ambiguity and undisclosed flexibility in the entire research process …

de, gb, it, at, no, hu (code pays fourni par la source)